2.6.2010: The
Trianon. Riding the Moscow - Budapest Train. Some
90 years ago, on June 4, 1920 the allies who won World War
II and the defeated Hungary signed a peace treaty – the Treaty
of Trianon - in the the Grand Trianon Palace in Versailles.
Subcarpathian Rusyns, Slovaks, Romanians, Croats, Serbs,
and the respective communities across the world rejoiced
at the liberation from the protracted Hungarian domination.
The treaty formalized the de facto situation in the Danube
basin after the War. As a result, Hungary lost 2/3 of its
former territory and population, including 3 mln ethnic Hungarians,
to other countries and stepped into an epoch of national
tragedy and humiliation. When Miklós (Nicolas) Horthy became
the country's dictator, the signing of the Treaty was officially
mourned, and till 1938 all Hungarian flags were flying at
half-mast. Every morning before classes, Hungarian schoolchildren
read a special prayer for the reunification of their country.
Hungary earned a revision of the Treaty of Trianon in 1938-1941
by siding with Nazi Germany. Ostensibly “restoring justice”,
Vienna arbitrations allowed Hungary to regain some of the
territories – the north of Romania, the south of Slovakia,
and Subcarpathian Ruthenia - carved out of it in 1920. In
1941 Germany occupied Yugoslavia, and Hungary got Vojvodina
as another reward for loyalty. The Subcarpathian Rusyns,
along with several other nations, inhabited all of the above
territories. Hungary's territorial acquisitions were reversed
after World War II and currently Hungary exists within the
borders set by the Treaty of Trianon, with seizable ethnic
Hungarian minorities residing in Romania, Slovakia, Austria,
Vojvodina, and Ukraine. Numerous descendants of the ethnic
minorities of the former Austro-Hungarian Empire, on the
other hand, live in the present-day Hungary. Over 150,000
ethnic Hungarians and some 800,000 Rusyns plus Romanian,
German, Gypsy, Slovakian, and Russian minorities live in
Subcarpathian Ruthenia which is a part of West Ukraine. Most
of them know some Hungarian and descend from the people who
– repeatedly and without formalities – happened to change
citizenship, in many cases becoming citizens of Hungary,
without moving out of
their homes. Last time such shifts happened in 1938-1944,
which, from the historical perspective, sounds like yesterday.

MarchMap of partition of the Kingdom of Hungary according to the 1920 Treaty
of Trianon
The political landscape in Hungary started to evolve at a breakneck
pace when Fidesz, a right-wing political party with a radically
nationalist agenda, won the national elections this year.
On May 17, Fidesz submitted to the Hungarian parliament a package
of draft legislation including the dual citizenship law.
Fidesz
deputy leader Kósa Lajos said the purpose of the amendment
is to grant dual citizenship to ethnic Hungarians living outside
of Hungary who have no permanent residences in the country,
used
to be citizens of Hungary but lost the citizenship due
to various international treaties or legal norms of other countries. The citizenship amendment was passed on
May 26 by 344 votes against 3 (socialists including former
Hungarian premier Ferenc Gyurcsány) and 5 abstained (3 socialists
and 2 from the Politics Can be Different green liberal party).
Since there are 386 seats in the Hungarian parliament, several
parliamentarians obviously were not present. Parliamentarians
stood up to cheer when the amendment was passed.
Now any citizen of a country neighboring
Hungary can claim being a descendant of citizens of Hungary
or the Austro-Hungarian Empire without supplying any documents,
demonstrate minimal fluency in Hungarian, and become a Hungarian
citizen (the rule does not apply to individuals having criminal
records in Hungary, currently put on trial in Hungary, or presenting
a potential threat to the security of the country). Hungarian
citizenship will be granted by the country's consulates, departments
of citizenship status records, or a special body authorized
by the government based on individual applications, which must
be processed within 3 months from he submission date.
Budapest is convinced that any sovereign
country enjoys unlimited freedom to set its citizenship procedures
and the international law puts no obstacles in the way of granting
citizenship to Hungarians residing outside of the country.
Authors of the legislation draft also remark that an analogous
law on shortcuts to citizenship existed in 1886 – at that time
it applied to the Hungarian-speaking minorities living in Moldova
(Romania).
On May 31, 2010 the Hungarian parliament
passed legislation declaring June 4 – the date the Treaty of
Trianon was signed – a day of national solidarity. The text
of the law describes the signing of the treaty as the greatest
tragedy in the history of the Hungarian nation and calls for
negotiations over all current conflicts stemming from it. It
also states that all Hungarian communities and their members
enslaved by neighboring countries belong to the undivided Hungarian
nation whose solidarity recognizes no borders, and that the
solidarity is an integral element of the Hungarian individual
and social identity.
The passing of the legislation caused
an outcry in Slovakia. The Slovakian government responded by
putting together draft legislation to amend the country's citizenship
law, and a session of the Slovakian parliament convened urgently
and passed the draft legislation at the first reading via a
rush accelerated procedure.
The temperature of further developments
was even higher. The citizenship law amendment was passed by
the Slovakian parliament by 90 votes (out of a total of 115)
against 7 and 17 who did no vote. In case the Slovakian president
endorses the law, after July 17 getting the citizenship of
another country would automatically entail the loss of the
Slovakian citizenship. Chances are, though, that the president
will not pen the document as revoking citizenship against the
will of its holder would be against the Slovakian constitution.
Other countries bordering Hungary seem
to be unperturbed by the new Hungarian citizenship law. Hungary's
new foreign minister János Martonyi visited seven neighboring
countries, encountering no opposition to his country's new
citizenship legislation.
The Hungarian minorities in Slovenia and
Croatia number just 0.45 and 0.1 of their populations, and
Serbia seeks to befriend Hungary – the country to hold the
rotating EU presidency since January 1, 2011 - as a part of
the Serbian government's broader EU aspirations.
Romania as the country distributing its
passports among the populations of Moldova and Subcarpathian
Ruthenia predictably avoids commenting on the issue. In fact,
largely it was Romania's example that proved motivating for
Hungary.
The Hungarian amendments made the US and
Canada nervous. Currently Hungarians from Romania, Serbia or
Ukraine need visas to enter the two countries, but the amendment
passed by the Hungarian parliament removes the obstacle. The
availability of Hungary's citizenships to Hungarians living
outside of the country also breeds problems for the Schengen
zone. Ukraine and Serbia are not in the EU, and Romania, a
EU member, remains shut out of the Schengen space. So far Brussels
is trying to be neutral. Matthew Newman, spokesman for European
Commissioner for Justice, Fundamental Rights and Citizenship
Vivian Reding, stressed that countries have sovereign rights
to decide on their citizenship rules, and the European Commission
has no right to intervene.
How is Ukraine – with its newly pro-Russian
orientation and residual pro-Western “orange” opposition –
going to react to the step made by the Hungarian parliament?
Ukrainian laws neither afford dual citizenship nor envisage
revoking the Ukrainian citizenship under any circumstances.
The anticipated consequence is that by mid-2011 Ukraine will
be drained of some 750,000 citizens - alleged former Hungarians
plus Rusyns from unrecognized Subcarpatian Ruthenia who will
certainly seize the opportunity to escape to the Schengen zone.
Chances are the governor of the Rusyn informal capital of Uzhgorod,
an ethnic Rusyn appointed by Kyiv, will also choose to flee...

26.5.2010. The Rusyns Delegation in Moscow. Before the "Moscow-Budapest" Train ?
Finally, what about Moscow? With an air
of importance, it keeps silence. Or, maybe, there is nothing
important about the silence and Moscow is completely oblivious
to what is going on at the outskirts of the Russian world?
Should Russia really worry that a few hundred thousand Rusyns
who used to struggle to preserve their Slavic identity will
leave Russia's immense expanses and end up absorbed by “the
highly civilized Europe”? So what – fewer people will claim
the Russian IDs, and those tend to be in short supply...